This page ranks RMM vendors on published price and on nothing else. It is not a quality ranking and cannot be one: we run no benchmarks, hold no support data and write no reviews, so a score would be an opinion dressed as a measurement. What we can do is rank the vendors that will tell you what they charge, which turns out to be four of eleven, and be exact about what each of the other seven did instead.
Ask vendors to quote against your actual endpoint count
Best rmm software: the ranking, and the criterion
- SuperOps: Ranked on published entry price alone. Its own calculator prices its 100-endpoint minimum at $1.50 an endpoint, $150 a month on the Prime plan, and the plan carries a PSA alongside the RMM, which no other published figure here does.
- NinjaOne: Ranked on published entry price alone. It publishes both ends of its volume curve, from $1.50 an endpoint at 10,000 endpoints to $3.75 at 50 or fewer, which is the most complete disclosure in this record even though it means admitting the expensive end.
- Level: Ranked on published entry price alone. A flat $2 per device per month for every device on the account with the first ten free, and no volume tiers at all, which is dearer at scale and cheaper than any minimum-bearing plan at small counts.
Why the ranking has three names and the market has eleven RMM providers
Seven of the eleven vendors in this record publish no figure we could read, so they cannot be ranked on price without inventing one. Datto's own RMM product page was read in full and carries no price at any plan level. ConnectWise, Kaseya, Atera, HaloPSA and Action1 answer a Cloudflare block to every reader available here, and Pulseway renders its figures by script so nothing could be matched. Those are three different findings and this record keeps them apart, because a vendor that has chosen not to publish has told you something about how it sells while a page we could not read has told you nothing at all. What none of it means is that the unranked vendors are expensive. It means they are unpriced in public, which is a problem you solve by asking rather than by assuming.
How to read a three-name RMM comparison without over-trusting it
The three published figures sit between $1.50 and $2.00 an endpoint a month at their respective entry conditions, which is a narrow band, and the narrowness is the useful finding rather than the order. Any of the three could be the cheapest for you depending on one variable: the minimum. SuperOps' $1.50 assumes 100 endpoints, so a 40-endpoint shop pays for 100 and Level's flat $2 with no minimum wins easily. Above a few hundred endpoints the tiered vendors pull ahead and keep pulling. So the ranking above is an ordering of entry prices, not a recommendation, and the honest way to use it is to take the band into the conversations with the seven vendors that would not print a number, and ask why theirs is different.
What this ranking deliberately ignores
Everything that is not a published price. Agent reliability on a poor connection, how long a routine job takes in the console, what support answers at two in the morning, how the patch catalogue behaves on an application it does not know, and whether your technicians will actually live in the interface. Those decide whether an RMM works and none of them can be read off a pricing page. A two-week deployment against real machines answers all five better than any comparison table, including this one, and the free tiers exist to let you run exactly that test before committing.
Is the best endpoint management software the same three names?
On published price it is, because the three vendors ranked above sell one platform and endpoint management is what that platform does. Nobody in this record prices endpoint management as a product of its own, so a separate ranking for it would be the same three names with a different heading over them. Where the two questions genuinely diverge is mobile: an internal team standardising on one console for laptops and phones is asking a unified endpoint management question, and that is not what these three are ranked on here.
The best RMM software for MSP work and the best RMM for small business are two questions
An MSP is buying multi-tenancy, per-client reporting and a bill that survives a client leaving, and it buys at a volume where the published curve bends in its favour. A small business with one office is buying the opposite: no minimum, no commitment, and a console one person can hold in their head. That is why Level's flat rate with the first ten devices free wins the second question and rarely the first, and why SuperOps' 100-endpoint minimum is irrelevant to a twenty-machine company and cheap for an MSP. The ranking above is ordered on published entry price; read it against which of those two buyers you are.
Questions people ask about best rmm software
What are the best RMM tools on published price?
On published entry price, SuperOps and NinjaOne both start at $1.50 an endpoint a month and Level is $2 flat with ten devices free. This is a price ranking only; we hold no quality data and publish no score.
Why are only three of the top RMM tools ranked?
Because only they publish a figure we could read. Datto publishes a product page with no price, five vendors' pages are blocked to us, and one renders its figures by script.
Among RMM platforms, does the cheapest entry price mean the cheapest bill?
No. Minimums decide it at small counts, where Level's flat $2 with no minimum beats SuperOps' $1.50 at a 100-endpoint minimum. Above a few hundred endpoints the tiered vendors pull ahead.
How should I actually choose between RMM solutions?
Use the published band to set expectations, take it into quotes from the vendors that do not publish, then run a two-week trial against real machines. Agent behaviour and console speed decide this and are on no pricing page.